Thursday, August 29, 2019

Some model blogs

Why the storm trooper?


For your blog posts, feel free to follow your interests and passions, even if you see only a tenuous connection to some of the main topics we have discussed so far. All I ask is that the blog posts draw our attention to a piece of writing, a clip, a news article, or even an excerpt from a novel or other longer work, and provide your take on that: why is it significant? What makes it meaningful for you? What do you want others to understand about it? Feel free to interpret comedy in the broadest possible sense: you can blog about not only things that are intentionally meant to be funny, but things that are unintentionally funny, or anything else that presents an interesting incongruity, unexpected detail, or surprising feature that is worth comment.

I'm always a bit hesitant to provide models, because there's no set formula for writing these posts. The following are just some examples of different things you could do, and you should feel free to ignore them if they are not interesting or appealing, for they are not at all the only way of approaching the subject.

Here is an example of a fun post on a very dry topic--typography--that nonetheless points out the unexpected beauties of a classic film (not exactly comedy, but an attention to the little details, which is often a key feature of comedy).

This post is a smart and silly critique of the unintentional comedy and inanities of popular culture.

Here's an example of a music review of an old album of an old band from my hometown that more or less became The Shins. It's not exactly an analysis of something comedic, but it is an insightful review that points out some interesting and unexpected details in its own way.

Of course, best and worst lists can always be a fun way to do a blog post.

You can go with something light and silly on college life or other close-to-home topics. Hey, it may seem a bit informal, but it actually does a very nice job of closely analyzing the language in the emails, albeit in a goofy way.

And of course, you can always try to elevate the dialogue when it comes to current events.

Finally, you can check out some of the previous student blogs for this course (you can find even more if you look in the archive for this blog). 

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

Lead blogger schedule

Lead blog posts are due on the days listed below (the Friday of the week before we discuss them). 

September 6: Kimberly (kimberlykiepek.blogspot.com)


Sept 13: John (
ComedyPhilo.blogspot.com)

Sept. 20: Jack (JackFBarton.wordpress.com)      


Sept. 27: Alex (www.reddit.com/user/ajn0928)


Oct. 4: Anna-Kathleen (captivatingcomedycomments.blogspot.com)


Oct. 11: Lauren (
https://laurenpetersonfyw.blogspot.com/)

Oct. 18: McKenna (
https://mckennafyw.wordpress.com)

Oct. 25: Elizabeth (elizabethfyw.wordpress.com)


Nov. 1: Mallory (mallorytfyw.blogspot.com/)


Nov. 8: Rebecca (rebeccasblogfyw.wordpress.com/)


Nov. 15: Walker (walkerfyw.blogspot.com)

Nov. 22 (to discuss on Dec. 4): Grace (gmorrellfyw.wordpress.com)



Monday, August 26, 2019

Welcome! Here is our course schedule updated in real time

After the first few weeks, the assignment for each Wednesday also includes reading and responding to the lead blogger, and the assignment for each Friday includes reading and commenting on your peers’ blogs. From time to time I may move readings around or replace them to more closely coincide with the class’s current interests. Watch this blog for these updates. All schedule changes will be posted here. I will only update the Moodle syllabus in the rare event of a course policy change. Although I will try to post an updated version of the schedule online as quickly as possible, you are responsible for all changes announced in class.




Course schedule:

Week 1: Introductions
M: August 26

W 28: Introduction.

Other activities: Start blog

F 30: Watch: Monty Python, Argument Clinic sketch.

Read: “Theories of Humor" and Nancy Sommers, Revision Strategies

Other activities: Start blog, email me the link, and select a date to serve as lead blogger. Post your first blog entry on the best piece of comedy you’ve seen recently (post the link or describe it), and whether you feel the reading helps you understand the work or its ideas.

Week 2 – Superiority, Incongruity, Relief: Theories of the Comic
M Sep. 2: Labor Day. No Class.

W 4: Read: Lippitt

Other activities: Write a blog post on which account you find most persuasive, and use another example of comedy to illustrate your claims. Do the theories just describe different types of comedy, or does one get closer to the essence (and why aren’t all examples of incongruity, superiority, or relief funny?)

F Sep. 6: Read: Lippitt

Week 3 – Peer Editing
M 9: Read Lippitt.

W 11: Blog discussion

Other activities: Post your response to the lead blogger’s post for all Wednesday classes. We will usually discuss the lead blog and the piece of comedy it analyzes on Wednesdays. We will also usually discuss some shorter readings to guide our discussion.

F 13: Read McGraw and Warner.

Other activities: Read each other’s posts and leave comments for each Friday class. Fridays we will continue our discussions of your blogs, focusing on your responses to each other. Highlighting the work of classmates during our discussion is an excellent way to participate. We will also use Fridays for activities such as peer editing or discussing an additional reading or a film.

Week 4 – Comedy and Politics
M 16: Read: “Waiting for the Conservative Jon Stewart.”

W 18: Blog discussion

F 20: Bring rough draft for peer editing.

Week 5 – When are We “Just Joking”?
M 23: Read: This Article on Trump’s Humor

W 25: Blog discussion

F 27: Paper 1 due. Writing workshop or possible library day.

Week 6 – Incongruity Theory’s Founding Father
M Sept. 30: Read: Hutcheson, “Thoughts on Laughter”

W 2: Blog discussion

F 4: Writing workshop or other activity TBA.

Week 7 – Great Job
M Oct. 7: Reading/Viewing TBA or Possible library day

W 9: Blog Discussion

F 11: Bring rough draft for peer editing.

Week 8 – All Your Breaks are Belong to Us
M 14: Fall break. No class.

W 16: Blog discussion

F 18: Paper 2 due. Writing workshop or library day.

Week 9 – Genres: Irony and Satire
M 21: Read The Irony of Satire

W 23: Blog discussion

F 25: Writing workshop or other activity TBA.

Week 10 – Comedy and Tragedy
M 28: Read: Zupancic

W 30: Blog discussion

F Nov. 1: Bring rough draft of paper 3.

Week 11 – We Live in a Society
M 4: Read Article on Gang Weed

W 6: Blog discussion

F 8: Paper 3 due. Writing workshop or other activity TBA.

Week 12 – Throwing Your Old Car Battery Into the Ocean
M 11: Read article on Tide Pod Memes and Article on Millennial Humor

W 13: Blog discussion

F 15: Bring Rough Draft of Paper

Week 13 – It’s Free Real Estate
M 18: Read: Article on Meme Warand Article on Memes and Politics

W 20: Blog Discussion

F 22: Bring rough draft of paper.

Week 14 – Wait for it…
M 25: Read: Article on Memes and Dadaism

W 27: Thanksgiving break

F 29: Thanksgiving break

Week 15 – Recovering from Steamed hams
M Dec. 2: Read: Zupancic

W 4: Bring draft.

F Dec. 6: Bring draft.

Week 16 – Press F
M 9: Last class.

W 11: Study day.

F 13: Final exams.

Monday, November 26, 2018

Training wheel phrase exercise

Here's the link to the exercise. Use this as a way to get started on your final paper if you are having problems. Even if you are not, it's not a bad idea to use some or all of the techniques this suggests.

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Essay 4 - Term Paper

The final paper will be a more developed, somewhat longer paper that builds on all the skills we have practiced so far: focusing on a narrowly defined topic, locating and entering a conversation, and supporting a strong claim. For this final paper, we will be increasing the number of peer-reviewed sources to five (5). The purpose of this added research will be to allow you to more fully develop the conversation you are joining, and to allow you to more authoritatively address the relationships between your sources and your position within the conversation.

For paper four, you might think of yourself as in a similar position to that of a journalist who is investigating a specialized issue and attempting to translate it into terms understandable by the general public. Talking to experts and reading their work will not only help you first grasp and understand the terms of the conversation, but it will allow you to clarify what you think is most important about the issue for your own readers, and to do so with authority. Comparing and contrasting the different scholarly views will let you clarify assumptions that one scholar relies on but that another scholar either disagrees with or articulates in a different form. 

Once again, you are free to write on any topic that is related to our course materials and discussions over the semester. If you are feeling stuck, remember that we have discussed two major types of papers so far: those that apply theories and research to specific pieces of comedy, and those that analyze an issue in comedy theory. You can focus on either of these or produce some combination of the two. The most important thing, regardless of topic, is to focus the majority of your paper (70-80%) on explaining/justifying your central claim and analyzing your evidence. 

The final paper should be 2000-2500 words long (not including works cited page) in Times New Roman, 12 point font, with 1 inch margins. If you want to have a chance to submit an early draft for a grade and full comments, you will need to submit it by Monday, November 26. The final paper is due Tuesday, December 11, by midnight.

Wednesday, November 7, 2018

A shameless plug



Looking for TA credit? Interested in comedy? Want to know about the ultimate origins of the weird and experimental comedy we read this semester? Well look no further than ENG304. It has the extremely dull title of Restoration and 18th Century English Literature, but I promise you it will be much more amusing than this sounds. There's all sorts of bizarre and wackadoodle texts from this period that are loads of fun to explore. For example: this and this and this and all these very real titles

Even if you are unsure about the course, go ahead and register since you can always switch classes during drop/add.

Course ID: 57896




Friday, October 26, 2018

In praise of bad writing

Another great thing about comedy is that it teaches us to love our flaws. But unlike the positive thinking or self-esteem movements, comedy doesn't just teach us to overcome our imperfections--it shows how our flaws are always already our strengths. The worst things about us are already the best things about us, simply in an inverted form. And our bad writing is already our good writing, just in a distorted form. The key task of a writer is to transform the anti-genius of the bad into the the genius of the good. It's like learning to recognize the great things about movies that are so bad they are good.

Here's a few things to ponder today as we free ourselves to "write bad."

First, consider how bad first drafts are the gateway to good ones. 

Second, consider how embracing our bad writing can be freeing.

Finally, consider the ways that bad writing is not all that different from good writing. What makes bad writing bad often has to do with the attitude of the writer. The writer is not communicating to others, but having an internal dialogue. There is nothing wrong about this. It simply suggests that we need to start having a dialogue with others, rather than giving a monologue. Even though the other person is silent, we should think of all writing as a conversation. The essence of a conversation is to see every statement as serving to bring the other person deeper into the topic, to entrance them, to wow them.

Bad writing is common. Very bad writing is uncommon for the same reason that very good writing is uncommon: it does something impressive. It fails in a way that is spectacular and risky.

As a wise man once said...